nexalign

Comparison

DecisionOS vs Loopio

Loopio is a response automation platform for teams answering inbound RFPs and security questionnaires. DecisionOS is the opposite side of the table: the buyer-side decision layer. Different users, different jobs. Buyers running a structured RFP often use DecisionOS to shape criteria, weights and dealbreakers, then issue the RFP and score responses back inside DecisionOS.

TL;DR

Loopio answers RFPs. DecisionOS decides who wins them.

Side-by-side comparison

CriterionDecisionOSLoopio
Side of the tableBuyerResponder (often vendor)
OutputDecision memo, weighted scoring, briefsCompleted RFP / questionnaire response
Core userCISO, CIO, buying committeeProposal manager, sales ops
Compliance mappingNIS2, DORA, ISO 27001, SOC 2Answer libraries

Choose DecisionOS when

  • ✓You are the buyer.
  • ✓You are structuring criteria before issuing an RFP.
  • ✓You are scoring vendor responses back to weighted criteria.

Stick with Loopio when

  • ·You respond to many inbound RFPs.
  • ·Your bottleneck is response volume and answer reuse.

How DecisionOS is different

Loopio accelerates the responder. DecisionOS structures the buyer. Same process, opposite sides. Both can coexist within the same organisation if it buys and sells.

Questions we get about this

Can Loopio-generated responses be scored inside DecisionOS?

Yes. Vendor responses can be imported and scored against the weighted criteria captured in the DecisionOS memo.

Loopio ist für RFP-Beantwortung. Wo passt DecisionOS?

Loopio hilft beim Beantworten von RFPs, also auf der Anbieter-Seite. DecisionOS hilft beim Stellen und Auswerten von RFPs, also auf der Käufer-Seite. Wer als Buying-Team mit Loopio-bestückten Lieferanten verhandelt, profitiert von einem strukturierten Memo, das die RFP-Antworten gewichtet einordnet.

Where is DecisionOS hosted?

The application, its databases, the self-hosted analytics and all backups run on dedicated servers in Germany operated by a European provider, under an Art. 28 GDPR data processing agreement. There is no hyperscaler, no US fallback and no cross-border replication of stored data. Two steps do leave the EU: decision memos and document extraction are generated by an AI provider in the USA and carry case content, and traffic reaches you through a content delivery provider that terminates TLS in front of the origin. Vendor research runs on anonymized prompts and carries no customer identity. These transfers rest on EU standard contractual clauses, and every sub-processor is listed by name, purpose and location at nexalign.io/hosting. Whether a given workload can accept them is a question we would rather you decide with the facts than discover later. The self-hosted analytics is cookie-free.

How do I evaluate DecisionOS for my next decision?

Book a 30-minute demo at nexalign.io/book. During the demo the team walks a real decision end-to-end using a scenario close to yours (EDR, IAM, sovereign cloud, ERP, whichever fits).

Book a demo →What is DecisionOS?